<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>rachalicious</title>
    <link>http://rachalicious.blogdrive.com/</link>
    <description>rachalicious</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:10:00 PDT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.blogdrive.com</generator>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005.</copyright>
    <category>Relationships</category>
    <item>
      <title>Men and Women</title>
      <link>http://rachalicious.blogdrive.com/archive/1.html</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>What can I say? I like to talk about this topic. Yesterday, I was reading this paper. It had this man and woman article. It was actually reviewing this book title something about understanding man in particular. But the writer was more concerned about the fact that the author was basing its book on 20 yrs research ( I think it's 20 yrs). The writer was saying that his wife can easily write the same book. He thought that people should get it by now, the understanding man thing. 


I think it is not so hard to understand man. It's just the part of getting it right makes it a little bit... (more)</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
